I feared the chance to learn could be less wealthy than it might be having a bigger group. A lot of the training in almost any training course occurs during interactions between participants, both throughout the training and through breaks. Bigger groups also generate a lot more dynamic energy than two individuals may possibly generate.
The little group would limit the amount of perspectives that may be shared and also the interpersonal learning that may occur. When feedback was necessary, it might be limited to exactly what the other participant and that i could offer.
In almost any TBR Training program, I still find it essential for the trainer to model how to setup, assign, facilitate and debrief participatory learning activities. Because most select few activities typically require a minimum of five to six participants, the little size the audience would certainly affect the kind of learning activities that may be used.
With simply two participants within the class, working out could be more serious. They'd be constantly responsible for learning, using the constant expectation and pressure to positively participate and lead. They'd be unable to coast with the class, counting on other participants to boost issues and volunteer for activities.
My participants originated from completely different cultures (Hawaiian and Midwest), had completely different personalities (extrovert and introvert), had completely different learning preferences (on the job and print), and labored in completely different areas (energy-efficiency and insurance). So, between the pair of them, we'd lots of diversity within the classroom.
Additionally they had many traits in keeping: an appreciation of learning, an openness to test something totally new and exceed their comfort zones, and great intelligence and insight. Both were very articulate and practical, with extensive experience performing learning their areas. They glued superbly.
The knowledge facilitating the train the trainer of these two individuals was really very rewarding. Trainers don't frequently have the opportunity to spend a long period of time with participants, researching their backgrounds, and benefitting using their differing perspectives.
Because there were only the pair of them, I'd great versatility to tailor working out for their specific needs and interests. It had been a genuine luxury so that you can take our time, have extended discussions, and conduct multiple practice sessions to make certain they could apply the things they had learned.
I could give all of them focused attention and immediate feedback. Even though the group was small, they effectively helped one another identify practical options to address their curriculum design and delivery problems.
Both participants left working out with lesson plans and learning activities they could immediately incorporate to their training programs. (I have subsequently found that among the participants will really be patenting and selling the game she designed!)
I left working out with restored energy and new insights from all of these two wonderful trainers. The knowledge also reinforced how important it's to construct in sufficient unhurried here we are at participants to understand additional skills, practice underneath the guidance from the trainer, practice with the help of other participants, and eventually practice individually. If your program has an excessive amount of content and a lot of participants, the training process could be seriously shortchanged.
Typically, I do not recommend performing a train the trainer program for 2 people. A bigger group offers a lot more options and benefits for learning. However, if well-rehearsed, a train the trainer program for two main people can nonetheless be extremely effective.
No comments yet